Фидиуӕг

Фидиуӕг

Фидиуӕг Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
Фидиуӕг from de

ФидиуӕгЗынаргъ хотӕ ӕмӕ ӕфсымӕртӕ, ацы каналы уӕ бон у ӕрвылбон фӕрсат/кӕсат ног хабӕрттӕ нӕ рӕсугъд ирон ӕвзагыл!

Стӕй-ма @ironkanal дарддӕр рекомендаци кӕнут уе 'мбӕлттӕн ӕмӕ уӕ хӕстӕджытӕн.

Стыр бузныг, @ironkanal

Open Telegram